US Tax Court says IRS’s ‘drift-net’ argument to expand privilege waiver must be anchored in principles

Posted on

Source: McDermott Will & Emery via 17 November 2017

“In cases where privilege is waived by asserting a reasonable-cause defense (to penalties), the question is the scope of the waiver.

Some courts have applied a fairness test to limit the scope of the waiver to reasonably contemporaneous documents, thereby not extending the scope of the waiver to legal advice rendered at a later date.

Estate of Levine is consistent with a recent pattern of the IRS aggressively arguing against the assertion of privilege and work-product protections in tax audits.

Taxpayers should carefully scrutinize IRS attempts to obtain privileged documents, and resist the IRS’s attempts to expand the waiver concept beyond reason and principle.

Courts are rightly reluctant to vitiate protections against disclosure, especially when the government’s arguments are full of holes!”

Source article here



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s